AI ChronicleAI 纪年 Full timeline →

Milestone · curated entry

AlphaGo beats Lee Sedol 4 to 1

AlphaGo versus Lee Sedol

Date
March 15, 2016
Category
Milestone
Organization / Model
Google DeepMind
Evidence
2 sources · 2 evidence families

AlphaGo won the match four games to one, and move 37 of the second game became a byword for machine creativity. The event carried reinforcement learning and Go search into public view.

Curator's note: Cross-checked against the Nature paper and DeepMind's official retrospective.

Curated sources · 2

  1. Original paper · Nature2016-03-15

    AlphaGo versus Lee Sedol

    nature.com

  2. Official announcement · DeepMind2016-03-15

    AlphaGo versus Lee Sedol

    deepmind.google

Cite this page

This page is a curated static snapshot and can be cited directly. Preferred format GB/T 7714—2025 (electronic resource [EB/OL]); the other 5 styles open below, together with the machine-readable files.

GB/T 7714—2025 (electronic resource [EB/OL])

AI 纪年. AlphaGo 以 4:1 战胜李世石[EB/OL]. (2016-03-15)[2026-11-03]. https://aihist.net/e/alphago-match-2016.html.

APA 7 · American Psychological Association

AI 纪年. (2016, March 15). AlphaGo 以 4:1 战胜李世石 [Web page]. https://aihist.net/e/alphago-match-2016.html

MLA 9 · Modern Language Association

"AlphaGo 以 4:1 战胜李世石." AI 纪年, 15 March 2016, aihist.net/e/alphago-match-2016.html. Accessed 3 Nov. 2026.

Chicago 17 · notes-bibliography

AI 纪年. "AlphaGo 以 4:1 战胜李世石." Published March 15, 2016. Accessed Nov. 3, 2026. https://aihist.net/e/alphago-match-2016.html.

IEEE · citation-reference list

"AlphaGo 以 4:1 战胜李世石," AI 纪年, 15 Mar. 2016. [Online]. Available: https://aihist.net/e/alphago-match-2016.html. [Accessed: 3 Nov. 2026].

ACM · author-date variant

AI 纪年. March 15, 2016. AlphaGo 以 4:1 战胜李世石. Retrieved November 3, 2026 from https://aihist.net/e/alphago-match-2016.html.

All six styles come from one template and can be compared word for word. [引用日期], Accessed, urldate and Y2 all carry this page's build date, 2026-11-03 — a static page is an immutable snapshot, so substitute the date you actually consulted it. The address in every style is the archive's canonical page: this English page translates the same snapshot, and the work keeps its name, so one record cites both. For one-click copying use the same entry in the timeline, which takes the day you opened it. Expand the other styles before printing.