AI ChronicleAI 纪年 Full timeline →

Research breakthrough · curated entry

Breiman proposes random forests

Random Forests

Date
October 2001
Category
Research breakthrough
Organization / Model
University of California, Berkeley
Evidence
1 source · 1 evidence family

The Machine Learning paper bootstraps samples, draws random feature subsets, and lets many decision trees vote. It delivers stable accuracy with little tuning and reports out-of-bag error and feature importance, remaining the default baseline for tabular and industrial modelling.

Curator's note: Cross-checked against the journal DOI.

Curated sources · 1

  1. Original paper · Machine Learning2001-10-01

    Random Forests

    doi.org

Cite this page

This page is a curated static snapshot and can be cited directly. Preferred format GB/T 7714—2025 (electronic resource [EB/OL]); the other 5 styles open below, together with the machine-readable files.

GB/T 7714—2025 (electronic resource [EB/OL])

AI 纪年. Breiman 提出随机森林,集成学习成为经典方法[EB/OL]. (2001-10)[2026-11-03]. https://aihist.net/e/random-forest-2001.html.

APA 7 · American Psychological Association

AI 纪年. (2001, October). Breiman 提出随机森林,集成学习成为经典方法 [Web page]. https://aihist.net/e/random-forest-2001.html

MLA 9 · Modern Language Association

"Breiman 提出随机森林,集成学习成为经典方法." AI 纪年, Oct. 2001, aihist.net/e/random-forest-2001.html. Accessed 3 Nov. 2026.

Chicago 17 · notes-bibliography

AI 纪年. "Breiman 提出随机森林,集成学习成为经典方法." Published Oct. 2001. Accessed Nov. 3, 2026. https://aihist.net/e/random-forest-2001.html.

IEEE · citation-reference list

"Breiman 提出随机森林,集成学习成为经典方法," AI 纪年, Oct. 2001. [Online]. Available: https://aihist.net/e/random-forest-2001.html. [Accessed: 3 Nov. 2026].

ACM · author-date variant

AI 纪年. October 2001. Breiman 提出随机森林,集成学习成为经典方法. Retrieved November 3, 2026 from https://aihist.net/e/random-forest-2001.html.

All six styles come from one template and can be compared word for word. [引用日期], Accessed, urldate and Y2 all carry this page's build date, 2026-11-03 — a static page is an immutable snapshot, so substitute the date you actually consulted it. The address in every style is the archive's canonical page: this English page translates the same snapshot, and the work keeps its name, so one record cites both. For one-click copying use the same entry in the timeline, which takes the day you opened it. Expand the other styles before printing.